Archive for the ‘Naperville DUI’ Category
April 27th, 2014 at 2:54 pm
Naperville Police Accuse man of DUI, Urination and Resisting Arrest. Interestingly, no one saw the person driving a car so this could be a tough case for the Naperville DUI Prosecutors. And the car was locked with the keys in the car. As reported in the Naperville Sun by Bill Bird:
“First, the 23-year-old Lisle man allegedly drove while drunk. Then, he supposedly stopped to relieve himself on the exterior wall of a home on Naperville’s northeast side. Then, he allegedly discovered he had locked himself out of his car. And, finally, he reportedly scuffled with the Naperville police officers who had been sent to investigate a complaint from a homeowner about someone making a nuisance of himself outside his house.”
“Further investigation revealed (Giannini) had relieved himself on the caller’s residence, and then found that he had locked himself out of his vehicle,” a black, 2010 Infiniti G7, Davis said.
“Giannini was found to be highly intoxicated, and was arrested for DUI,” Davis said. “While being placed under arrest, Giannini actively resisted arrest and tried to pull away from the officers, to prevent being placed into handcuffs.”
April 9th, 2014 at 1:21 pm
As reported on Digital Journal:
Naperville DUI Lawyer Wins Illinois Supreme Court Case
Naperville, IL (PRWEB) April 09, 2014
Naperville DUI Lawyer Donald J. Ramsell recently won an Illinois Supreme Court case for his client. Ramsell presented his oral arguments for the case People v. Deforest Clark (Case No. 15776) held before the Illinois Supreme Court back in January. The case questioned the constitutionality of eavesdropping laws in Illinois. In the opinion reached, the Illinois Supreme Court ruled that the state’s criminal eavesdropping statute is unconstitutional.
The panel of Judges decided that the statute violated the First Amendment because it applied to all conversations, including those conversations that cannot be considered private such as loud exchanges on a private street, a political debate on a college campus or the public communications between law enforcement and citizens. The Illinois Eavesdropping Act, which bans the audio recording of conversations without the consent of all parties, has been scrutinized for years as Illinois legislative efforts to revise the law have continuously fallen short.
Illinois DUI lawyer Donald Ramsell along with attorney Nicole Sartori represented the defendant Deforest Clark in relation to the two felony counts charged against him for recording conversations with an opposition attorney during child support hearing 11CF464 held in Kane County Court.
“Obviously, my client is extremely pleased with the outcome. We felt that it was the correct decision. My client was simply trying to keep a record of a court proceeding that he was handling pro se, there was never any nefarious intent on his part, ” explains criminal defense attorney Donald Ramsell.
Criminal attorney Donald Ramsell is a managing partner at Ramsell & Associates, LLC. Ramsell focuses his practice on DUI’s, criminal law, drug crimes, felonies, misdemeanors and traffic violations. In 2013, Ramsell was selected for membership to the Top 100 Trial Lawyers organization. The organization recognizes attorneys for their knowledge, skill and success held by only the elite attorneys in the United States. He was also named a 2014 Illinois Super Lawyer by Chicago Magazine, which marks his 8th Super Lawyer designation.
Ramsell & Associates, LLC has been featured in the media throughout the country including on ABC’s 20/20, CNN, CBS, NBC, FOX, COURT –TV and Hannity and Colmes. The Illinois criminal law firm has also appeared in the New York Times, Washington Post and on various national and local radio shows.
Ramsell & Associates, LLC is located in Wheaton, IL. The firm has defended over 13,000 clients since its establishment in 1986. If you are facing criminal charges and would like to work with an experienced criminal attorney call 1-800-DIAL-DUI or fill out the online contact form for a free case review.
Read the full story at http://www.prweb.com/releases/Naperville-DUI/Lawyer-Donald-Ramsell/prweb11747852.htm
Read more: http://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/1840965#ixzz2yPleIFxz
January 27th, 2014 at 3:59 pm
Generally, when one thinks of a DUI charge, it applies to someone who has been driving a car. However, this is not always the case. A DUI charge in Illinois may apply if you are driving another form of vehicle such as a boat, small watercraft, or even an all-terrain vehicle.
The recent case of 24-year-old Katheryn J. Daly is a good example. According to The News-Gazette, Daly was driving a John Deere Gator on County Road 1700 E on October 6 when she hit a patch of wet gravel. The vehicle skidded out of control, left the road, and eventually rolled onto its side. The passenger, Katheryn Daly’s 19-year-old cousin Annie Daly, was trapped underneath the vehicle and later died of her injuries.
Katheryn Daly admitted to police that she had been drinking earlier that night at a relative’s house, and failed field sobriety tests. A blood-alcohol test administered at the county jail revealed that her blood-alcohol concentration was 0.13 percent, well over the Illinois state DUI limit of 0.08 percent. She has been charged with misdemeanor driving under the influence of alcohol and failure to reduce speed to avoid an accident. She is scheduled to appear in court on November 8.
She faces serious penalties under the law, which may include hefty fines and jail time.
DUI laws are complicated, and it can be difficult to know where your case falls, or how the law applies. Whether you were driving a car, all-terrain vehicle, or watercraft if you have been accused of a DUI offense, contact an experienced DUI attorney in Illinois that you can trust. Our professionals can help you ensure that your case is being treated fairly under the law, and make sure that you receive adequate representation in court. Contact us today for a free case evaluation.
August 30th, 2013 at 2:10 pm
In Illinois, it is illegal to drive a vehicle under the influence of alcohol or other drugs. When it comes to alcohol, a person will be considered under the influence if they have a blood alcohol concentration of .08 or more, or if the circumstances indicate that they are unable to operate a vehicle safely.
One may be considered under the influence even if their blood alcohol content is substantially below .08, as long as there is enough evidence to show that they were not acting normally. In a DUI stop, the field sobriety test will be a strong indicator of this even without a breathalyzer test.
The first time a person is caught driving under the influence, they are subject to a Class A misdemeanor, revocation of their license and a minimum $750 fine. The second time they are caught, they will be subject to a Class A misdemeanor, license revocation, five days imprisonment (or 240 hours of community service), as well as having to have an ignition interlock device installed in their vehicle.
Illinois law also has harsher punishment for cases where the driver was driving while intoxicated while transporting a child under 18 or if there is an accident. If the there was an accident, the defendant is liable for all the expenses associated with emergency medical vehicles. Moreover, under Illinois law, each subsequent DUI (especially aggravated ones) will carry stiffer penalties.
Lastly, if a driver is found guilty of a DUI, they may also be ordered to undergo counseling to determine if they have a substance abuse problem.
The Illinois DUI statutes contain specific guidelines and impose stiff penalties on violators. However, those same guidelines can enable a person to fight or appeal their DUI charge if the process was flawed. If you are facing a DUI, do not take a chance, have an Illinois DUI attorney who knows the system fight for you.
August 26th, 2013 at 1:54 pm
Imagine this: you are sitting at a stop light with your loved one, awaiting your turn. Then, in an instant, your life is over because of another person’s lapse in judgment. This is what happened to Bryan Bulger, who was waiting his turn at a stop light. As he waited with his girlfriend sitting in the passenger seat, another driver, Jason Rymut, slammed into Bryan’s car while driving 83 miles per hour. The force of the impact caused Bryan’s car to crash into a third vehicle. The force of the impact caused massive injuries to Bryan’s head and body, killing him instantly. Bryan’s girlfriend and the driver of the third car survived, as did the drunk driver.
Prior to the crash, Rymut was using his cell phone and the black box in his vehicle revealed that he was driving at speeds reaching 86 miles per hour. During their investigation, police promptly smelled alcohol in Rymut’s breath and blood drawn at the hospital revealed that his blood alcohol content was .121, substantially more than the maximum Illinois allows.
Considering the evidence against him, Jason Rymut opted to plead guilty to charges of aggravated driving under the influence instead of taking a chance with a jury. The judge considered Bryan’s age, the emotional nature of the case, the toll that Bryan’s death had taken on his family and girlfriend, and sentenced Rymut to nine years in prison. The judge stated that Rymut’s decision to drive drunk showed a “callous disregard” for the safety of other people, ultimately taking Bryan’s life, and Rymut should spend his sentence contemplating the “horrific results of his collision.”
Drinking and driving is serious and can have devastating effects on the driver and the public. If you face DUI charges, consult an experienced Illinois DUI attorney.
July 22nd, 2013 at 10:08 pm
When people are convicted of DUI offenses, law enforcement has certain ways to keep them from driving drunk again. In 2009, Illinois instituted that breath alcohol ignition interlock devices (BAIID) should be installed in the vehicles of parties guilty of drunk driving.
The BAIID requires that the operator of the vehicle to breathe into a device that can stop the car from working if the blood alcohol level of the driver is equal to or higher than .05 percent. This has worked to varying degrees since the have been installed in cars, with DUIs declining overall since 2009.
Officials maintain that BAIIDs are often misused by the very people they are trying to protect. Some previous offenders have anyone else blow into the device, including children. Others have used tanks of compressed air in order to drive drunk. The problem is so bad that Illinois State administrator Susan McKinney estimates that of the 11,000 drivers with BAIIDs, over 3,000 are caught trying to drive over the limit every year.
Now an attempt is being made to even stop those circumventing these ignition devices. Prior to the 4th of July celebrations, Illinois has started including new technologies in ignition interlock devices. It is a camera which snaps a picture each time the device is used, that way there is no foul play or cheating the test.
Illinois DUI defense attorney Donald Ramsell is a major opponent of this new technology. Not only does he feel that this is an invasion of privacy but that the measure to add cameras to these devices is not supported by any evidence that proves their necessity.
If you have been pulled over under suspicion of DUI, don’t fight by yourself. The law office of Donald Ramsell has defended over 10,000 drivers just like you. Contact their experienced DUI defense attorneys in Wheaton who can advise you through this difficult time.
June 19th, 2013 at 8:23 pm
According to a recent article, Illinois Secretary of State Jesse White has expressed support of the idea of reducing the state drunk-driving limit from .08 to .05 blood alcohol content.
The National Transportation Safety Board has reported that this change could reduce the risk of car accidents by half. Although they recommend that the entire nation adopt this new DUI limit, it will be up to each state’s lawmakers to make that decision.
Illinois State Rep. Dennis Reboletti has stated that our lawmakers will need to work with the secretary of state’s office as well as police in order to determine if this change should be made.
Reboletti has raised the point that the limit was once at .10 and was decreased to .08. He has also said that a task force would be needed to “look over” the suggestion during the summer to see if it’s truly reasonable.
Reboletti also proposed his own drunk-driving legislation recently, in which punishments for drivers-for-hire who are caught driving drunk will be much more severe.
Reboletti said, “I think it’s pretty fair to say if you are out drinking with friends and you hire a bus or a cab, you don’t want the driver to be more drunk than you are.”
This new proposal is reportedly in response to a limo driver being charged with a DUI while taking Oswego High School students to their prom.
In that situation, the driver would only be charged with a misdemeanor DUI. Under Illinois law, a driver-for-hire can only be charged with an aggravated DUI on a first offense if they are transporting passengers under the age of 18.
If you have any questions at all about this new proposal, especially if it does become reality, contact an experienced Illinois DUI lawyer to assist you.
Image courtesy of Keerati/Freedigitalphotos
June 14th, 2013 at 11:27 am
Benjamin J. Black, 28, of Sycamore, was arrested in May in connection with the February crash that killed 11-year-old Matthew Ranken, according to the Chicago Tribune. Black “had heroin in his system when he caused a chain-reaction” incident, in which he “failed to stop for a line of cars that were halted because of another crash.” Several other motorists were also taken to the hospital with non-life threatening injuries. Black’s arrest is just one of many in the Chicago area involving heroin use. According to ABC Local Chicago, “heroin addiction is a growing problem across Illinois” and law enforcement, doctors, family members of community leaders are “trying to confront the problem.”
And it’s not just in the inner city that heroin use is a growing problem, according to ABC Local. One retired Chicago police officer, John Roberts, had moved his family from the city to the suburbs upon retirement, and it was there that his “son started using heroin and eventually died from an overdose,” reports ABC Local. Roberts told ABC that he “was shocked that he did not know how dangerous it was. And I was shocked that many other kids his age were involved with drugs and heroin.”
According to National Highway Traffic Safety Administration statistics and reported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), “more than 16 percent of weekend, nighttime drivers tested positive for illegal, prescription, or over-the-counter medications. More than 11 percent tested positive for illicit drugs.” A different study, according to the NIDA, found that in Maryland, 34 percent of car accident victims tested positive for drugs only, while only 16 percent tested positive for alcohol only. The institute notes that because this represents only one geographic location, findings cannot be generalized, but the numbers are concurrent with a spike in illicit drug use in the Chicago area.
Black has been charged with aggravated DUI and faces incarceration if convicted. If you or someone you know has been charged with a crime such as this, don’t go through it alone. Contact a dedicated Chicago-area DUI attorney today.
Image courtesy of antpkr / FreeDigitalPhotos.net
June 8th, 2013 at 2:02 pm
According to an article in the Sun Times, a new rule regarding ignition interlock devices will go into effect in Illinois on July 1st. Currently, drivers who wish to continue driving after a DUI arrest can opt to have an ignition interlock device installed into their vehicle. The driver must blow into the device, and if there is any alcohol on the driver’s breath, the vehicle will not start. The new rule also requires a camera to be installed into the vehicle, to ensure that the person who takes the breathalyzer is the same person who drives the car.
Supporters of the device include Susan McKeigue, the state director of Mothers Against Drunk Driving, who said, “There are so many people who try to defeat the devices. Anything that helps keep them honest, we’re in favor of.”
However, not everyone thinks that adding the camera is a good idea. Not only does the extra equipment raise the price of installing and borrowing the device, limiting the number of people who can afford it, it is also seen as an invasion of privacy.
Donald Ramsell, a DUI attorney based in Wheaton, Illinois, said, “It’s just another creep into the invasion of privacy of drivers. You literally have Big Brother sitting in the car with you.” Ramsell explained that because of the position of the camera, the front seat passenger or other passengers in the vehicle may be in the images too. “It’s a subtle crossing of the line, but it’s a momentous one”, said Ramsell.
If you’ve been arrested and accused of driving under the influence, installing an ignition interlock device is one way to retain your driving privileges when your license is suspended. However, Ramsell and others have argued against camera requirement because most interlock devices require periodic breath tests while driving.
Ramsell said, “Is your friend going to sit in the car and keep blowing into the tube so you can drive drunk?”
Donald Ramsell is a highly qualified DUI attorney in Illinois. He will help you fight for your rights if you’ve been accused of driving under the influence. Click here to contact him today!
Image courtesy of xedos4/Freedigitalphotos
June 4th, 2013 at 1:06 pm
Here in the state of Illinois, there are very strict laws regarding driving under the influence. In many cases, you can face license suspensions or revocations, fines, and even jail time. But what happens if you have been pulled over by an officer and charged with your very first DUI?
If you have been pulled over with a blood-alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.08% or higher, you may face some of the following consequences: jail, fines, license suspension, or community service.
For your first DUI, it is possible for you to be looking at up to one year of jail time. However, this sentence can be increased by up to six months if a child under 16 was in the vehicle with you. In regards to fines, you may face up to $2,500. Also keep in mind that you will probably end up paying for legal expenses, which can further increase this amount. A $500 minimum fine can be added to your original fine if your BAC is above 0.16%. Another $1,000 minimum can be added if a child under 16 was in the vehicle.
If charged with a DUI, you could possibly have your license suspended for a minimum of one year, well as a possible vehicle registration suspension. Community service is another likely consequence you will face, with 100 hours minimum if your BAC is over 0.16%, or 25 days if a child under 16 was in the vehicle.
While not as serious as a second or third DUI, your first DUI is still a very serious matter. If you have been charged with a DUI, be sure to contact a dedicated Illinois DUI attorney to represent your case and answer any questions you may have.
Image courtesy of xedos4/Freedigitalphotos